Influencer Marketing Lawsuits: What Shein, Celsius, and Revolve Lawsuits Mean for FTC Compliance

Influencer marketing has grown into a $21 billion industry, but with that growth comes legal scrutiny. Once considered the “wild west” of digital advertising, influencer campaigns are now regularly at the center of lawsuits, regulatory investigations, and consumer class actions.

In recent months, brands including Shein, Celsius, and Revolve have all faced class action

lawsuits tied to influencer promotions.

At the heart of these disputes are two questions: Did influencers properly disclose their relationships with brands, and did consumers receive accurate information?

For attorneys, these lawsuits are a clear signal that influencer advertising isn’t just about creative campaigns and viral content — it’s a source of significant litigation risk. And for expert witnesses, it’s a space where clear explanations of platforms, advertising compliance, and consumer behavior are critical.

Background on the Class Actions

Shein: The fast-fashion giant has been criticized for its aggressive influencer outreach, where creators promote “haul” videos showcasing large volumes of inexpensive clothing. Recent lawsuits claim that Shein’s influencer campaigns misled consumers by failing to disclose sponsorships and downplaying environmental and labor concerns tied to its supply chain.

Celsius: The energy drink brand faced class action claims tied to influencer endorsements that allegedly overstated product benefits and failed to comply with FTC disclosure standards. The plaintiffs argued that consumers were deceived by influencer-led health claims that lacked substantiation.

Revolve: Revolve, a major e-commerce fashion retailer, has faced lawsuits alleging that its influencer campaigns did not adequately disclose paid partnerships. While some cases have been compelled to arbitration, they underscore the vulnerability brands face when disclosure rules aren’t followed.

The Common Thread: All of these cases hinge on FTC guidelines for endorsements and advertising disclosure. The FTC requires that any “material connection” between a brand and an influencer (such as payment, free products, or commissions) be “clearly and conspicuously” disclosed. Failure to do so opens both brands and influencers to liability.

Why These Cases Matter for Attorneys

1. FTC Enforcement Meets Civil Claims: Even if the FTC doesn’t bring an enforcement action, consumers can — and increasingly do — pursue class actions based on alleged deception. This dual track of liability raises the stakes for brands.

2. Vicarious Liability for Brands: Brands are not shielded by influencers’ independent status. Courts are showing that if an influencer misleads consumers, the sponsoring brand can be held responsible.

3. Evidence ChallengesSocial media content is fluid. Influencers delete, edit, or archive posts. Stories disappear after 24 hours. That makes evidence preservation (screenshots, archives, metadata) crucial in litigation. Attorneys must act quickly to secure content before it vanishes.

4. Precedent BuildingThese lawsuits are setting early precedents for influencer liability. How courts interpret disclosure obligations, contract clauses, and consumer expectations will shape influencer marketing law for years to come.

The Role of an Expert Witness

In cases like these, expert witnesses play a critical role in bridging the gap between legal arguments and digital reality.

As a social media and digital marketing expert witness, here are the areas where I support attorneys:

• Disclosure Compliance: Assessing whether influencer posts met FTC standards for clear, conspicuous disclosure.

• Content Reconstruction: Rebuilding influencer campaigns from partial data (archived posts, screenshots, analytics) when content has been deleted or altered.

• Consumer Impact: Analyzing engagement metrics to determine the likely influence of non-disclosed or misleading posts on consumer behavior.

• Platform Mechanics: Explaining how social media platforms label ads, amplify content, and present disclosures across mobile vs. desktop.

These insights are not only useful for litigation strategy but also for educating judges and juries who may have limited familiarity with influencer marketing practices.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Influencer Marketing Litigation

The Shein, Celsius, and Revolve class actions highlight a few key trends:

1. More Consumer Class Actions: As influencer marketing continues to grow, consumer attorneys are increasingly turning to class actions to address alleged advertising harms. Expect more cases in 2025 and beyond.

2. Contracts Will Tighten: Brands are learning that vague influencer agreements are risky. Future contracts will include specific disclosure requirements and indemnification clauses to mitigate liability.

3. Routine Use of Experts: As cases become more technical, attorneys will rely more heavily on expert witnesses to explain digital advertising norms, platform mechanics, and compliance standards.

4. Digital Evidence Preservation: Attorneys handling influencer cases must prioritize preserving social media content at the earliest stage possible — before posts are edited or disappear.

Conclusion

The lawsuits against Shein, Celsius, and Revolve underscore a fundamental truth: influencer campaigns aren’t just marketing strategies — they’re potential liabilities. For attorneys litigating these cases, the stakes are high, and the evidence is complex.

Expert witnesses can play a critical role in making sense of influencer content, compliance standards, and consumer impact. By clarifying the technical and marketing context, experts help courts reach fair and informed outcomes.

👉 If you’re handling cases involving influencer marketing, FTC advertising compliance, or social media evidence, I’d be glad to share my CV and case list as a resource.